22. July 2009 by Carlos Casanova.

Hi folks,

In one of my Twitter exchanges, someone asked for a list of Open Source ITSM solutions. What I had available was a list I gathered over the years that targeted CMDB versus general ITSM.

I can’t speak to how good/bad these sites are since I gathered most of these over the years when doing my initial research starting back in 2004/05. I checked to confirm they are still all live but not whether they are up-to-date with recent advancements or if they’ve gone off the deep end into skepticism or flying high in the sky over the lands of ITILtopia.

Read them yourself and make your own judgments.
CMDB Info.com
http://www.cmdb.info/p/index.html

Zenoss
http://www.zenoss.com/product/network-management

ProcessWorx CMDB ( I believe they were Open Source but this would need to be confirmed )
http://www.processworx.com/products/ITSM/cmdb.htm

ONE CMDB
http://www.onecmdb.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

CMDBuild.org ( Spanish Language site )
http://www.cmdbuild.org/

easyCMDB
http://www.easycmdb.com/

You can follow me on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/CarlosCasanova

Also, please visit the K2 Solutions Group Inc. website at http://www.k2sg.com for other related articles and presentations available for free download.

Posted in General | No Comments »

8. July 2009 by Carlos Casanova.

I recently had a discussion with someone about the notion that some individuals believe that the CMDB is not possible to implement and that ITIL V3 is too complex. Because of this, they are recommending that companies stick with ITIL V2 vs V3. The main point we kicked around was the fact that if individuals don’t fully appreciate the intentions of the ITIL V2 and the CMDB, they could very easily fall into the trap and believe that it can’t be done.  This is a mindset that I believe has been the foundation of most failed ITIL efforts.

ITIL V3, although on the surface to some may appear to be more complex than ITIL V2, is in fact a clarification of ITIL V2 much more so than it is an upgrade. Many of the components detailed in the ITIL V3 literature are merely elements that were left out of the V2 literature forcing every individual and organization to fend for themselves in trying to define what it all meant and how they were going to glue it all together.  In ITIL V3 however, they have made a valiant effort to at least identify these areas and document some best practice around them. I am not stating that everything in the ITIL V3 literature be viewed as gospel by any means but it is at least is a step in the right direction to identify the gaps and put some structure around them.
This lead us to the discussion on whether or not a CMDB can be built. I would agree that a “CMDB” is very hard and possibly impossible to build ‘IF’ and ONLY ‘IF’ your view of it is a single monolithic repository as prescribed by the black & white written words of the ITILV2 literature. If however, you fully digested the purpose of what the CMDB was intended for and what problems you were trying to resolve by implementing it, I totally disagree that it can not be done. The concept of a CMDB can be deployed but it must be in the form of a federated CMS if you stand any chance to succeed.

The  key to success is in the simplicity of purpose. Like every other complex entity, the CMS is just made up of smaller components that can be addressed somewhat independently but under an over-arching umbrella.  If tackled on that level, the CMS can become a reality to most organizations. I’m not implying that it will be done overnight and won’t come without challenges, challenges which will typically be on the cultural side rather than process or technology end.  A key element to this success of course is still a true adoption of the purpose of ITIL and not simply a belief that it is something “you implement”. If your organization and/or leadership believes it is a project to implement rather than a philosophy to adopt, you will very likely not succeed regardless of whether you head down the ITIL V2 or V3 path.

ITIL is much more of a cultural transformation rather than a process or technology implementation and until everyone accepts that, there will continue to be many failed attempts to implement ITIL, regardless of which version is being attempted.

About the Blogger

Carlos Casanova is the founder of K2 Solutions Group, Inc. and co-author of “The CMDB Imperative”. You can follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/CarlosCasanova

Posted in Simplification, General | No Comments »